From 77b3ac8c6521d836dd3c6ef247c252293920fd52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: NeilBrown Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 11:18:59 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] monitor: make return from read_and_act more symbolic. Rather than just a number, use a named flag. This makes the code easier to understand and allows room for returning more flags later. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown --- monitor.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c index 29bde18..cfe4178 100644 --- a/monitor.c +++ b/monitor.c @@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ static void signal_manager(void) * */ +#define ARRAY_DIRTY 1 static int read_and_act(struct active_array *a) { unsigned long long sync_completed; @@ -218,7 +219,7 @@ static int read_and_act(struct active_array *a) int check_reshape = 0; int deactivate = 0; struct mdinfo *mdi; - int dirty = 0; + int ret = 0; int count = 0; a->next_state = bad_word; @@ -254,14 +255,14 @@ static int read_and_act(struct active_array *a) if (a->curr_state == write_pending) { a->container->ss->set_array_state(a, 0); a->next_state = active; - dirty = 1; + ret |= ARRAY_DIRTY; } if (a->curr_state == active_idle) { /* Set array to 'clean' FIRST, then mark clean * in the metadata */ a->next_state = clean; - dirty = 1; + ret |= ARRAY_DIRTY; } if (a->curr_state == clean) { a->container->ss->set_array_state(a, 1); @@ -269,7 +270,7 @@ static int read_and_act(struct active_array *a) if (a->curr_state == active || a->curr_state == suspended || a->curr_state == bad_word) - dirty = 1; + ret |= ARRAY_DIRTY; if (a->curr_state == readonly) { /* Well, I'm ready to handle things. If readonly * wasn't requested, transition to read-auto. @@ -284,7 +285,7 @@ static int read_and_act(struct active_array *a) a->next_state = read_auto; /* array is clean */ else { a->next_state = active; /* Now active for recovery etc */ - dirty = 1; + ret |= ARRAY_DIRTY; } } } @@ -459,7 +460,7 @@ static int read_and_act(struct active_array *a) if (deactivate) a->container = NULL; - return dirty; + return ret; } static struct mdinfo * @@ -629,7 +630,6 @@ static int wait_and_act(struct supertype *container, int nowait) rv = 0; dirty_arrays = 0; for (a = *aap; a ; a = a->next) { - int is_dirty; if (a->replaces && !discard_this) { struct active_array **ap; @@ -644,14 +644,14 @@ static int wait_and_act(struct supertype *container, int nowait) signal_manager(); } if (a->container && !a->to_remove) { - is_dirty = read_and_act(a); + int ret = read_and_act(a); rv |= 1; - dirty_arrays += is_dirty; + dirty_arrays += !!(ret & ARRAY_DIRTY); /* when terminating stop manipulating the array after it * is clean, but make sure read_and_act() is given a * chance to handle 'active_idle' */ - if (sigterm && !is_dirty) + if (sigterm && !(ret & ARRAY_DIRTY)) a->container = NULL; /* stop touching this array */ } }