Added test for array degradation for spare-same-slot
spare-same-slot allows re-adding of missing array member with disk re-inserted into the same slot where previous member was plugged in. If in the meantime another spare has been used for recovery, same slot cookie should be ignored. Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Czarnowski <przemyslaw.hawrylewicz.czarnowski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5be68a0762
commit
b4924220f1
|
@ -966,11 +966,13 @@ static int array_try_spare(char *devname, int *dfdp, struct dev_policy *pol,
|
|||
* arrays/containers that match 'target'.
|
||||
* If 'target' is set and 'bare' is true, we prefer the
|
||||
* array which matches 'target'.
|
||||
* target is considered only if we deal with degraded array
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (target) {
|
||||
if (strcmp(target->metadata, mp->metadata) == 0 &&
|
||||
memcmp(target->uuid, mp->uuid,
|
||||
sizeof(target->uuid)) == 0) {
|
||||
sizeof(target->uuid)) == 0 &&
|
||||
sra->array.failed_disks > 0) {
|
||||
/* This is our target!! */
|
||||
if (chosen)
|
||||
sysfs_free(chosen);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue