Both super-ddf and super-intel ignore memory allocation failures during
->activate_spare. Fix these up by cancelling the activation.
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Made the mistake of recompiling the F9 mdadm rpm which has a patch to
remove -Werror and add "-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE -O2" which turns on lots
of errors:
config.c:568: warning: ignoring return value of asprintf
Assemble.c:411: warning: ignoring return value of asprintf
Assemble.c:413: warning: ignoring return value of asprintf
super0.c:549: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super0.c:742: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super0.c:812: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super1.c:692: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super1.c:1039: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super1.c:1155: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:508: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:645: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:696: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:715: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:1476: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:1603: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:1614: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:1842: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:2013: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:2140: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2143: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2147: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2150: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2162: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2169: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2172: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2176: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2181: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2686: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:2690: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:3070: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:3254: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
bitmap.c:128: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
mdmon.c:94: warning: ignoring return value of write
mdmon.c:221: warning: ignoring return value of pipe
mdmon.c:327: warning: ignoring return value of write
mdmon.c:330: warning: ignoring return value of chdir
mdmon.c:335: warning: ignoring return value of dup
monitor.c:415: warning: rv may be used uninitialized in this function
...some of these like the write() ones are not so trivial so save those
fixes for the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
md/resync_start reports different terminal values depending on kernel
configuration (~0UL versus ~0ULL). Make detection of the
resync-complete state more robust by comparing against array size.
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
mdadm -I /dev/part-of-container
should add that to a container, creating if it needed,
and then try to assemble any arrays in the container.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When we assemble an array, there are three different approaches
depending on whether metadata is internal or external, and on
kernel version.
Move all this to a common helper instead of duplicating in 3 places.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When we first start an array, it might be good to start recovery
straight away. That requires setting the array to 'dirty', but
only the metadata handler can know if that is required or not.
So have a third possible 'consistent' option to set_array_state.
Either 'no' or 'yes' or 'you choose'.
Return value indicates what was chosen.
'1' (no) should be chosen unless there is a good reason.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Using buffered IO risks non-atomic updates to parts of the
device that we don't actually want to write to. This isn't in
general safe.
So switch to O_DIRECT for all that IO and make sure we have
properly aligned buffers.
1/ track if there are any actual updates pending, and only
write metadata when we have changed something.
2/ when writing null virtual-configs, write full blocks,
not just the first 4 bytes. This will allow O_DIRECT
writes in a subsequent patch.
When loading the metadata for a subarray (super_by_fd), we set
->subarray to be the name read from md/metadata_version so that
getinfo_super can return info about the correct array.
With this we can differentiate between a container and
an array within the container by looking at ->subarray[0].
Only one superswitch should be externally visible for each
general type. Others which handle different flavours
(e.g. container/data-array) should be internal only.
Code in manager can now just call queue_metadata_update with a
(freeable) buf holding the update, and it will get passed to the
monitor and written out.
'container_member' isn't really a well defined concept.
Each metadata might enumerate members differently, so just
let each format /mdX/YYYY as appropriate.
I want the metadata handler to have more control over the 'version',
particularly for arrays which are members of containers.
So discard st->text_version and instead use info->text_version
which getinfo_super can initialise.