The check for 'enough spares' doesn't apply to RAID0 as we don't
mind it going degraded. But add a test that there are enough spares
to actually produce a working array.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Some grow operations must be applied to a whole container. These
are performed one array at a time, so only one array appears to
be reshaping.
When re-assembling such an array, we need to make sure that
when the reshape finished, we move on to the next array.
So require metadata to set ->reshape_active = 2 in that case,
and use reshape_container to complete the reshape.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Now that the external metadata handler must provide an md-compatible
old/new geometry, sys_set_array can do all of the array set-up for
an array that is undergoing reshape.
That leave less for reshape_array to do.
Also clean up how reshape_array tells if the reshape has started or
not.
Don't use ->reshape_active as that doesn't tell us anything consistent
at this stage, only use the 'restart' flag passed in.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When assembling array using assemble_container_content() for external
metadata case, array is in 'readonly' state already.
There is not necessary to duplicate this operation.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When calling reshape_array() for external metadata 'container name'
parameter have to be passed.
Find and pass container name in external metadata case.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When changing level when a new number of raid disks was explicitly
specified, we much make sure that the change implied by the
change in level is properly incorporated into the final result.
So explicitly track the change in number of parity disks
(delta_parity) and use it together with delta_disks to determine
final data_disks.
Also set info->delta_disks so other code doesn't need to mirror
this analysis.
And add some errors in cases where a new number of disks was
requested but is not currently supported
Reported-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Transition raid5 to raid0 was not covered in analyse_change()
Missing case added.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
For external metadata cases, information about number of spares cannot
be get via ioctl GET_ARRAY_INFO for particular array
(as info variable is initialized by). In md this information is present
in container object not array one.
This causes need to get spare disks number from external metadata.
This information is required for reshape_array() function to decide
if spare disks number satisfy operation requirements.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Delta_disk can be set to UnSet value.
This can a cause to pass wrong parameter to reshape_super().
To avoid such situations raid_disks and delta_disks parameters
have to be passed to reshape_super() separately.
It will be up to reshape_super() function validation
and usage of this parameters to avoid not valid values.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
After level migration array is left frozen.
When process is not externally forked reshape_array() should
unfreeze array before exit (this is not container operation).
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Problem occurs when we want to expand single disk raid0 array.
This is done via degraded 2 disks raid4 array. When new spare disk
for reshape is added to array, md immediately initiates recovery before
mdadm can configure and start reshape. This is due fact that 2 disk
raid4/5 array is special md case.
Mdmon does nothing here because container is blocked.
This is caused because after takeover array is not in frozen state in md.
Put array in to frozen state after takeover to allow mdadm to finish
configuration before reshape is executed in md.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When container operation fails before child process starts,
array can be left frozen because container_reshape() doesn't make
unfreeze() operation in all error cases, as it is responsible for.
add unfreeze() operation for error case scenarios in reshape_container()
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
reshape_prepare_fdlist and child_monitor currently have slightly
different ideas of the 'old number of raid devices' which can cause
major confusion.
So settle on one value, and assign it to odisks early and always use
it.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
kernel requires sync_max to be a multiple of the current
chunk size. This is not really 'correct', but we need to work
with it. So round down.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Due to a miscalculation we didn't initialise the whole file.
There is 4K (8 sectors) for the metadata, then the data.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When restarting a reshape with internal metadata, the new geometry
is already set and the reshape has been start (but has not been
allowed to continue yet).
So in that case, don't set things and don't ask for a reshape.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
The value of 'array' might not be current, so SET_ARRAY_INFO
and fail. Just refresh it before setting raid_disks.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Problem has been observed when raid10<->raid0 takeover operation
is executed.
In code updating layout, raid_disks and chunk_size for non-restriping
operations in reshape array functions SET_ARRAY_INFO ioctl call was
not succeeded.
Takeover process finish execution with error, mdadm shows message:
"mdadm: failed to set disks"
Cause is not meeting SET_ARRAY_INFO ioctl requirements:
- only one parameter may be changed at one time
- level of current array info and new info should be the same
Patch introduces solution for this issue.
At the beginning of discussed code we read current information
about array and then compare them with new values should be set.
If particular value is different (and should be set),
we are overwrite only this one in array info and then call ioctl.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
For raid10 -> raid0 takeover operation we should reject disks
in mirror by marking them as 'failed' and then remove them from
array by writing "remove" to disk state.
For external metadata second action is executed by mdmon.
According the description in monitor.c:175 when monitor detect
"faulty" in device state, it blocks the device, mark it as failed
in metadata, unblocks the device and finally writes "remove"
to device state.
For external case writing "remove" to device state in mdadm
is not necessary and harmful.
It may cause following issues:
1. "remove" operation for external case in mdadm is not finish
with successful result because monitor may block the device or disk
has been already removed by monitor.
2. If disk is removed by mdadm earlier than mdmon catch "failed" state,
metadata is not properly updated- is not marked as failed.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
After loop can occurs that due to 0 value reported by kernel
we have 0 in completed variable.
This is wrong. we are interested in real completed point.
0 value means that we reached sync point set in md,
so we can set completed variable to just reached point.
this point value is stored in max_progress variable.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
mdadm should verify if reshape is started before it goes
in to check-pointing machine.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Problem occurs when we want to expand single disk raid0 array.
This is done via degraded 2 disks raid4 array. When new spare
is added to array, md immediately initiates recovery before
mdadm can configure and start reshape. This is due fact that 2 disk
raid4/5 array is special md case. Mdmon does nothing here because
container is blocked.
Put array in to frozen state allows mdadm to finish configuration
before reshape is executed in md.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When analyse_change sets level=1, data_disks is meaningless
as is layout.
So don't set them, and make sure we ignore them.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Add support for raid1 to raid0 takeover operation in user space.
This patch includes support for native and imsm metadata.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
During reshape when reshape is finished in md, progress_reshape() hangs
on select().
This is because 'sync_completed' is reset to zero before 'sync_action'
becomes 'idle', and we don't look for notification on 'sync_action'.
So if completed becomes zero after reshape_progress has made some
progress, then deduce that reshape has finished.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
when in container are present raid0 and raid5 arrays, and reshape order is:
1. raid0 array
2. raid5 array
mdadm cannot set new raid_disks for raid0 array. For this action md has to have
handshake with mdmon. We have the following conditions:
1. Raid0 is not monitored
2. raid0 has been just takeovered to raid4/5 (it has to be monitored
3. monitor has to start monitor new raid4/5 array
4. monitor is not started (it is started to second raid5 array)
In such situation pig_monitor is required to let know to m monitor about new array
(not in the starting monitor case only)
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
The patch introduces takeover from level 10 to level 0 for imsm
metadata. This patch contains procedures connected with preparing
and applying metadata update during 10 -> 0 takeover.
When performing takeover 10->0 mdmon should update the external
metadata (due to disk slot and level changes).
To achieve that mdadm calls reshape_super() and prepare
the "update_takeover" metadata update type.
Prepared update is processed by mdmon in process_update().
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
- when reshaping a container, ->reshape_active is already set
even though it isn't really active yet, so we need to set
the new geometry even when reshape_active is set. This is safe.
- When restarting a reshape, make sure the reshape_position is set
appropriately when external metadata is used.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Only adjust reshape_progress based on the backup that was found
if the backup covered the current reshape_progress point.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When reshaping backwards we only backup from backup_blocks to
the start, so initialise backup_point appropriately.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
I'm seen mdadm spinning while failing to read 'degraded'.
This doesn't really fix it, but is a reminder that it needs to be
fixed.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When reshaping from the end of the array to the start, for times
when the number of data devices is decreasing, the handling of the
backup area isn't a simple mirror of the handling on low-to-hi
reshapes as the backup areas is always low in the array.
So re-write that to make it work.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When reshaping it is correct to open containers exclusively, but not
arrays. The array could very easily be in use, e.g. by a mounted
filesystem.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
For non re-striping transitions array must be unfrozen
before end of processing.
For restriping transitions we normally let the child
unfreeze the array but in this case there is no child.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
reshape.after.data_disks field must be initiated
for raid0<->raid10 transition.
Instead calculated spares_needed variable in reshape_array
function has random value.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When mdadm falls in "reduce size" error on takeovered array it jumps
to release and tries execute backward takeover. This time sra pointer
is not initialized and coredump is generated.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When we restart an array in the middle of a reshape, we reuse a lot of
the code for starting the reshape, but it needs to know that
circumstances are slightly different.
So add a 'restart' arg which is used:
- skip checking and adding spares
- activate the array (rather than start reshape)
- allow the backup file to already exist
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When restarting an array that is in the middle of a reshape,
sync_min cannot be set. So just ignore any errors we get
when trying to set it.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
NeilBrown
Adam Kwolek
Krzysztof Wojcik