The bitmap is stored on member devices, not on the array, so
--examine-bitmap should be given the member device.
If --examine-bitmap is given an array, and it doesn't have a bitmap
on it (i.e. it isn't a member of some other array), then that
is probably a usage error, so print a helpful message.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Now that we use O_DIRECT for all device IO, BLKFLSBUF is not needed to
ensure we get current data, and it can impose a cost if any flush-out
is needed. So remove it.
To be safe, add O_DIRECT to one place where it isn't currently used:
when reading a bitmap.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
malloc should never fail, and if it does it is unlikely
that anything else useful can be done. Best approach is to
abort and let some super-daemon restart.
So define xmalloc, xcalloc, xrealloc, xstrdup which don't
fail but just print a message and exit. Then use those
removing all the tests for failure.
Also replace all "malloc;memset" sequences with 'xcalloc'.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
This is needed on 4K block devices such as DASD as we do O_DIRECT
reads.
Do the same alignment for gpt just to be safe.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
We were adding 1, presumably to avoid div-by-zero possibilities.
It is better to only substitute '1' if the value actually is zero,
else for small numbers of bits the difference is visible.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When left-shifting we must be sure that the value being
shifted is large enough to not lose bits.
The 'chunkssize' in CreateBitmap is only 'long' so it
can overflow. So cast to 'long long' first.
Also fix a similar issue in Detail even though it isn't currently
being compiled.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reported-by: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>
Unlike native md checkpointing some data about the geometry and type of
the migration process is coded into curr_migr_unit. Provide logic to
convert between md/{resync_start|recovery_start} and imsm/curr_migr_unit.
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Apparently the dereferencing of a type-punned pointer breaks strict
aliasing rules. And we wouldn't want to do that.
So just make a different array of the appropriate type and use memcpy.
Resolves-Debian-bug: 505375
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
We really should never divide by 0.
Thanks to "Jon Nelson" <jnelson-linux-raid@jamponi.net>
for finding the problem.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Made the mistake of recompiling the F9 mdadm rpm which has a patch to
remove -Werror and add "-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE -O2" which turns on lots
of errors:
config.c:568: warning: ignoring return value of asprintf
Assemble.c:411: warning: ignoring return value of asprintf
Assemble.c:413: warning: ignoring return value of asprintf
super0.c:549: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super0.c:742: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super0.c:812: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super1.c:692: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super1.c:1039: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super1.c:1155: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:508: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:645: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:696: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:715: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:1476: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:1603: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:1614: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:1842: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:2013: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:2140: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2143: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2147: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2150: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2162: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2169: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2172: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2176: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2181: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2686: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:2690: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:3070: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:3254: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
bitmap.c:128: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
mdmon.c:94: warning: ignoring return value of write
mdmon.c:221: warning: ignoring return value of pipe
mdmon.c:327: warning: ignoring return value of write
mdmon.c:330: warning: ignoring return value of chdir
mdmon.c:335: warning: ignoring return value of dup
monitor.c:415: warning: rv may be used uninitialized in this function
...some of these like the write() ones are not so trivial so save those
fixes for the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
When adding a device to an array, we check that it is large enough.
Currently the check makes sure there is also room for a reasonably
sized bitmap. But if the array doesn't have a bitmap, then this test
might be too restrictive.
So when adding, only insist there is enough space for the current
bitmap.
When Creating, still require room for the standard sized bitmap.
This resolved Debian Bug 500309
Using buffered IO risks non-atomic updates to parts of the
device that we don't actually want to write to. This isn't in
general safe.
So switch to O_DIRECT for all that IO and make sure we have
properly aligned buffers.
From: Luca Berra <bluca@vodka.it>
glibc 2.4 is pedantic on ignoring return values from fprintf, fwrite and
write, so now we check the rval and actually do something with it.
in the Grow.c case i only print a warning, since i don't think we can do
anything in case we fail invalidating those superblocks (is should never
happen, but then...)
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
When creating a file bitmap, choose a default size that
results in fewer than 2^21 chunks. Without this kmalloc
failure in the kernel becomes likely.
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
A pending patch to the kernel causes bitmap file updates
to not go through the page cache, so O_DIRECT is needed to
ensure that we read current data.
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Currently this includes
--write-behind to set level of write-behind supported
--write-mostly to flag devices as write-mostly.
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
NeilBrown
Jes Sorensen
Dan Williams
Paul Clements