Boost C++ Libraries Home Libraries People FAQ More

PrevUpHomeNext

Binomial Distribution

#include <boost/math/distributions/binomial.hpp>
namespace boost{ namespace math{

template <class RealType = double,
          class Policy   = policies::policy<> >
class binomial_distribution;

typedef binomial_distribution<> binomial;

template <class RealType, class Policy>
class binomial_distribution
{
public:
   typedef RealType  value_type;
   typedef Policy    policy_type;

   static const unspecified-type clopper_pearson_exact_interval;
   static const unspecified-type jeffreys_prior_interval;

   // construct:
   binomial_distribution(RealType n, RealType p);

   // parameter access::
   RealType success_fraction() const;
   RealType trials() const;

   // Bounds on success fraction:
   static RealType find_lower_bound_on_p(
      RealType trials,
      RealType successes,
      RealType probability,
      unspecified-type method = clopper_pearson_exact_interval);
   static RealType find_upper_bound_on_p(
      RealType trials,
      RealType successes,
      RealType probability,
      unspecified-type method = clopper_pearson_exact_interval);

   // estimate min/max number of trials:
   static RealType find_minimum_number_of_trials(
      RealType k,     // number of events
      RealType p,     // success fraction
      RealType alpha); // risk level

   static RealType find_maximum_number_of_trials(
      RealType k,     // number of events
      RealType p,     // success fraction
      RealType alpha); // risk level
};

}} // namespaces

The class type binomial_distribution represents a binomial distribution: it is used when there are exactly two mutually exclusive outcomes of a trial. These outcomes are labelled "success" and "failure". The Binomial Distribution is used to obtain the probability of observing k successes in N trials, with the probability of success on a single trial denoted by p. The binomial distribution assumes that p is fixed for all trials.

[Note] Note

The random variable for the binomial distribution is the number of successes, (the number of trials is a fixed property of the distribution) whereas for the negative binomial, the random variable is the number of trials, for a fixed number of successes.

The PDF for the binomial distribution is given by:

The following two graphs illustrate how the PDF changes depending upon the distributions parameters, first we'll keep the success fraction p fixed at 0.5, and vary the sample size:

Alternatively, we can keep the sample size fixed at N=20 and vary the success fraction p:

[Caution] Caution

The Binomial distribution is a discrete distribution: internally, functions like the cdf and pdf are treated "as if" they are continuous functions, but in reality the results returned from these functions only have meaning if an integer value is provided for the random variate argument.

The quantile function will by default return an integer result that has been rounded outwards. That is to say lower quantiles (where the probability is less than 0.5) are rounded downward, and upper quantiles (where the probability is greater than 0.5) are rounded upwards. This behaviour ensures that if an X% quantile is requested, then at least the requested coverage will be present in the central region, and no more than the requested coverage will be present in the tails.

This behaviour can be changed so that the quantile functions are rounded differently, or even return a real-valued result using Policies. It is strongly recommended that you read the tutorial Understanding Quantiles of Discrete Distributions before using the quantile function on the Binomial distribution. The reference docs describe how to change the rounding policy for these distributions.

Member Functions
Construct
binomial_distribution(RealType n, RealType p);

Constructor: n is the total number of trials, p is the probability of success of a single trial.

Requires 0 <= p <= 1, and n >= 0, otherwise calls domain_error.

Accessors
RealType success_fraction() const;

Returns the parameter p from which this distribution was constructed.

RealType trials() const;

Returns the parameter n from which this distribution was constructed.

Lower Bound on the Success Fraction
static RealType find_lower_bound_on_p(
   RealType trials,
   RealType successes,
   RealType alpha,
   unspecified-type method = clopper_pearson_exact_interval);

Returns a lower bound on the success fraction:

trials

The total number of trials conducted.

successes

The number of successes that occurred.

alpha

The largest acceptable probability that the true value of the success fraction is less than the value returned.

method

An optional parameter that specifies the method to be used to compute the interval (See below).

For example, if you observe k successes from n trials the best estimate for the success fraction is simply k/n, but if you want to be 95% sure that the true value is greater than some value, pmin, then:

pmin = binomial_distribution<RealType>::find_lower_bound_on_p(n, k, 0.05);

See worked example.

There are currently two possible values available for the method optional parameter: clopper_pearson_exact_interval or jeffreys_prior_interval. These constants are both members of class template binomial_distribution, so usage is for example:

p = binomial_distribution<RealType>::find_lower_bound_on_p(
    n, k, 0.05, binomial_distribution<RealType>::jeffreys_prior_interval);

The default method if this parameter is not specified is the Clopper Pearson "exact" interval. This produces an interval that guarantees at least 100(1-alpha)% coverage, but which is known to be overly conservative, sometimes producing intervals with much greater than the requested coverage.

The alternative calculation method produces a non-informative Jeffreys Prior interval. It produces 100(1-alpha)% coverage only in the average case, though is typically very close to the requested coverage level. It is one of the main methods of calculation recommended in the review by Brown, Cai and DasGupta.

Please note that the "textbook" calculation method using a normal approximation (the Wald interval) is deliberately not provided: it is known to produce consistently poor results, even when the sample size is surprisingly large. Refer to Brown, Cai and DasGupta for a full explanation. Many other methods of calculation are available, and may be more appropriate for specific situations. Unfortunately there appears to be no consensus amongst statisticians as to which is "best": refer to the discussion at the end of Brown, Cai and DasGupta for examples.

The two methods provided here were chosen principally because they can be used for both one and two sided intervals. See also:

Lawrence D. Brown, T. Tony Cai and Anirban DasGupta (2001), Interval Estimation for a Binomial Proportion, Statistical Science, Vol. 16, No. 2, 101-133.

T. Tony Cai (2005), One-sided confidence intervals in discrete distributions, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 131, 63-88.

Agresti, A. and Coull, B. A. (1998). Approximate is better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Amer. Statist. 52 119-126.

Clopper, C. J. and Pearson, E. S. (1934). The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika 26 404-413.

Upper Bound on the Success Fraction
static RealType find_upper_bound_on_p(
   RealType trials,
   RealType successes,
   RealType alpha,
   unspecified-type method = clopper_pearson_exact_interval);

Returns an upper bound on the success fraction:

trials

The total number of trials conducted.

successes

The number of successes that occurred.

alpha

The largest acceptable probability that the true value of the success fraction is greater than the value returned.

method

An optional parameter that specifies the method to be used to compute the interval. Refer to the documentation for find_upper_bound_on_p above for the meaning of the method options.

For example, if you observe k successes from n trials the best estimate for the success fraction is simply k/n, but if you want to be 95% sure that the true value is less than some value, pmax, then:

pmax = binomial_distribution<RealType>::find_upper_bound_on_p(n, k, 0.05);

See worked example.

[Note] Note

In order to obtain a two sided bound on the success fraction, you call both find_lower_bound_on_p and find_upper_bound_on_p each with the same arguments.

If the desired risk level that the true success fraction lies outside the bounds is α, then you pass α/2 to these functions.

So for example a two sided 95% confidence interval would be obtained by passing α = 0.025 to each of the functions.

See worked example.

Estimating the Number of Trials Required for a Certain Number of Successes
static RealType find_minimum_number_of_trials(
   RealType k,     // number of events
   RealType p,     // success fraction
   RealType alpha); // probability threshold

This function estimates the minimum number of trials required to ensure that more than k events is observed with a level of risk alpha that k or fewer events occur.

k

The number of success observed.

p

The probability of success for each trial.

alpha

The maximum acceptable probability that k events or fewer will be observed.

For example:

binomial_distribution<RealType>::find_number_of_trials(10, 0.5, 0.05);

Returns the smallest number of trials we must conduct to be 95% sure of seeing 10 events that occur with frequency one half.

Estimating the Maximum Number of Trials to Ensure no more than a Certain Number of Successes
static RealType find_maximum_number_of_trials(
   RealType k,     // number of events
   RealType p,     // success fraction
   RealType alpha); // probability threshold

This function estimates the maximum number of trials we can conduct to ensure that k successes or fewer are observed, with a risk alpha that more than k occur.

k

The number of success observed.

p

The probability of success for each trial.

alpha

The maximum acceptable probability that more than k events will be observed.

For example:

binomial_distribution<RealType>::find_maximum_number_of_trials(0, 1e-6, 0.05);

Returns the largest number of trials we can conduct and still be 95% certain of not observing any events that occur with one in a million frequency. This is typically used in failure analysis.

See Worked Example.

Non-member Accessors

All the usual non-member accessor functions that are generic to all distributions are supported: Cumulative Distribution Function, Probability Density Function, Quantile, Hazard Function, Cumulative Hazard Function, mean, median, mode, variance, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, kurtosis_excess, range and support.

The domain for the random variable k is 0 <= k <= N, otherwise a domain_error is returned.

It's worth taking a moment to define what these accessors actually mean in the context of this distribution:

Table 5.1. Meaning of the non-member accessors

Function

Meaning

Probability Density Function

The probability of obtaining exactly k successes from n trials with success fraction p. For example:

pdf(binomial(n, p), k)

Cumulative Distribution Function

The probability of obtaining k successes or fewer from n trials with success fraction p. For example:

cdf(binomial(n, p), k)

Complement of the Cumulative Distribution Function

The probability of obtaining more than k successes from n trials with success fraction p. For example:

cdf(complement(binomial(n, p), k))

Quantile

Given a binomial distribution with n trials, success fraction p and probability P, finds the largest number of successes k whose CDF is less than P. It is strongly recommended that you read the tutorial Understanding Quantiles of Discrete Distributions before using the quantile function.

Quantile from the complement of the probability

Given a binomial distribution with n trials, success fraction p and probability Q, finds the smallest number of successes k whose CDF is greater than 1-Q. It is strongly recommended that you read the tutorial Understanding Quantiles of Discrete Distributions before using the quantile function.


Examples

Various worked examples are available illustrating the use of the binomial distribution.

Accuracy

This distribution is implemented using the incomplete beta functions ibeta and ibetac, please refer to these functions for information on accuracy.

Implementation

In the following table p is the probability that one trial will be successful (the success fraction), n is the number of trials, k is the number of successes, p is the probability and q = 1-p.

Function

Implementation Notes

pdf

Implementation is in terms of ibeta_derivative: if nCk is the binomial coefficient of a and b, then we have:

Which can be evaluated as ibeta_derivative(k+1, n-k+1, p) / (n+1)

The function ibeta_derivative is used here, since it has already been optimised for the lowest possible error - indeed this is really just a thin wrapper around part of the internals of the incomplete beta function.

There are also various special cases: refer to the code for details.

cdf

Using the relation:

p = I[sub 1-p](n - k, k + 1)
  = 1 - I[sub p](k + 1, n - k)
  = ibetac(k + 1, n - k, p)

There are also various special cases: refer to the code for details.

cdf complement

Using the relation: q = ibeta(k + 1, n - k, p)

There are also various special cases: refer to the code for details.

quantile

Since the cdf is non-linear in variate k none of the inverse incomplete beta functions can be used here. Instead the quantile is found numerically using a derivative free method (TOMS 748 algorithm).

quantile from the complement

Found numerically as above.

mean

p * n

variance

p * n * (1-p)

mode

floor(p * (n + 1))

skewness

(1 - 2 * p) / sqrt(n * p * (1 - p))

kurtosis

3 - (6 / n) + (1 / (n * p * (1 - p)))

kurtosis excess

(1 - 6 * p * q) / (n * p * q)

parameter estimation

The member functions find_upper_bound_on_p find_lower_bound_on_p and find_number_of_trials are implemented in terms of the inverse incomplete beta functions ibetac_inv, ibeta_inv, and ibetac_invb respectively

References

PrevUpHomeNext